Cases 61 - 70 of 306
Doe v. State of Oregon et al
as 2:2022cv00550
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Nicole Morgan, Melissa Aguilar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00557
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Friar v. Jackson et al
as 2:2022cv00304
Plaintiff:
Joshua Thomas Friar
Defendant:
Kevin Jackson, Jeff Darcy, J. Stark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eaton v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv00117
Plaintiff:
Aaron Dale Eaton
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections, Ms. Colette Peters, Ms. Heidi Steward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spillers v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2021cv01886
Plaintiff:
Danny Spillers
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections, Kevin Jackson, Theron Rumsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carmack v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2021cv01887
Plaintiff:
Joshua Carmack
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections, Kevin Jackson, Theron Rumsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kambarov v. Perry et al
as 2:2021cv01849
Plaintiff:
Rashid K Kambarov and Rashid K. Kambarov
Defendant:
Mandi Perry, Shawn Gibbs, Tyler Blewett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
French v. Roberts et al
as 2:2021cv01816
Plaintiff:
Jim French
Defendant:
Warren Roberts, S. Johston, D. Vetlanfer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holcomb v. Grassley et al
as 3:2021cv01727
Plaintiff:
Duard Holcomb
Defendant:
Dr. Grassley, John Doe, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daugherty v. Patton et al
as 2:2021cv01723
Plaintiff:
Kevin Daugherty
Defendant:
Dr. Mark Patton, TLC Board, Dr. Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
