Cases 61 - 70 of 345
Travis Dean v. Jack Palmer
as 13-15272
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TRAVIS REMAUL DEAN
Defendant - Appellee:
JACK PALMER
Lamarr Rowell v. Jack Palmer, et al
as 13-15221
Petitioner - Appellant:
LAMARR ROWELL
Respondent - Appellee:
JACK PALMER and NEVADA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Michael Clark v. Kelly Belander, et al
as 13-15048
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL ALLAN CLARK
Defendant - Appellee:
KELLY BELANDER, DON HELLING, JACK PALMER and others
Quintero et al v. Palmer et al
as 3:2013cv00008
Defendant:
Associate Warden, Chapel Director, Correctional Officers of Gatehouse and others
Plaintiff:
Dirk Klinke, Kevin Pope and John Quintero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Westman v. Palmer et al
as 3:2012cv00675
Respondent:
Nevada Attorney General and Jack Palmer
Petitioner:
John Westman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dean v. Palmer
as 3:2012cv00658
Plaintiff:
Travis Remaul Dean
Defendant:
Jack Palmer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morowski v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2012cv00593
Respondent:
Isidro Baca, Director Cox, Jack Palmer and others
Petitioner:
Paul B. Morowski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Spisak v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2012cv00588
Respondent:
Isidro Baca, Catherine Cortez-Masto, Director Cox and others
Petitioner:
John Spisak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Quintero et al v. Palmer et al
as 3:2012cv00565
Defendant:
Gibson, Irwin, Murgia and others
Plaintiff:
Dirk Klinke, Kevin Pope and John Randall Quintero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
William Bell v. Jack Palmer, et al
as 12-17263
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM MITCHELL BELL
Respondent - Appellee:
JACK PALMER and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
