Cases 61 - 70 of 129
Evans v. Peters et al
as 2:2017cv00786
Defendant:
Doug Abbott, Lt. Steve Boston, C.O. Linda Carter and others
Plaintiff:
Michael James Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haaby v. Mosman et al
as 3:2017cv00629
Defendant:
D Charles Bailey, NFN Bailey, Bob Hermann and others
Plaintiff:
Darrick Shane Haaby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Clardy v. Jones et al
as 2:2017cv00178
Defendant:
Richard Adams, Matthew Barba, Jason Bell and others
Plaintiff:
Sir Giorgio Sanford Clardy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Voth v. Amisberry et al
as 2:2016cv02200
Defendant:
Amisberry, Boston, D. Duwelius and others
Plaintiff:
Frank E. Voth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bostwick v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2016cv02015
Plaintiff:
Aaron P. Bostwick, Sr.
Defendant:
Lt. Hageland, Ms. Hascall, Greg Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez-Aguilera v. Bell et al
as 2:2016cv01889
Defendant:
Jason Bell, Robert Jones and John W. Kyle
Plaintiff:
C. Gonzalez-Aguilera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wells v. Rosenblum et al
as 2:2016cv01403
Defendant:
Robyn M. Anderson, Vicki Applegate, Kelly Ashton and others
Plaintiff:
Leroy Lamont Wells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barrett v. Peters et al
as 6:2016cv01073
Plaintiff:
Jacob Barrett
Defendant:
Jimmy Coker, M. Davidson, Julie Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Nooth
as 2:2016cv01021
Petitioner:
Scott M. Jones
Unknown:
Lisa Hay
Respondent:
Mark Nooth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
French v. Daniels et al
as 2:2016cv00674
Defendant:
O/O Daniels, Sgt. Franks, O/O A. Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Tony French
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
