Cases 61 - 70 of 87
Byerly v. OHIO, State of et al
as 2:2014cv00266
Plaintiff:
Stephen W. Byerly
Defendant:
OHIO, State of, Jeff Payton, James DeWeese and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davis v. Coakley et al
as 4:2014cv00008
Plaintiff:
Ronald L. Davis
Defendant:
Joe Coakley, Michell Fulgum, K. King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jennings et al v. Rastaher et al
as 1:2013cv00868
Plaintiff:
Lemarr Jennings and Alonzo Dean Shepard, r
Defendant:
Douglas M. Rastaher, Gary Mohr, Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Beightler et al
as 3:2013cv02609
Plaintiff:
Herbert Anderson
Defendant:
M. Beightler, McKee, Ms. Master and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Miller
as 1:2013cv02270
Petitioner:
Daemon King
Respondent:
Michelle Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Fishbein v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Corrections et al
as 3:2013cv01902
Plaintiff:
Robert J. Fishbein
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Corrections , Management Training Corporation and Matthew King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fishbein v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Corrections et al
as 2:2013cv00650
Plaintiff:
Robert J. Fishbein
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Corrections , Management Training Corporation and Matthew King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Bunting
as 1:2013cv00250
Petitioner:
David King
Respondent:
Jason Bunting
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson et al v. Attorney General of the United States et al
as 1:2012cv00964
Plaintiff:
Zachary Johnson and Russell Keith Hill
Defendant:
Attorney General of the United States, Attorney General State of Mississippi, Michael T. Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
King v. Morgan
as 1:2012cv02000
Petitioner:
Delawrence A. King
Respondent:
Donald Morgan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
