Cases 61 - 70 of 82
Cooper v. Mechanick et al
as 1:2010cv01118
Plaintiff:
Joe F. Cooper
Defendant:
Stephen Mechanick, Steve Eichel, Leo Shea and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gibbs v. O'Neill et al
as 1:2010cv01034
Plaintiff:
Myron V. Gibbs
Defendant:
Brendan O'Neill, Kevin J. O'Connell and Todd E. Conner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooke v. Wood et al
as 1:2010cv01014
Plaintiff:
James E. Cooke, Jr.
Defendant:
Steven P. Wood, Jerome O. Herlihy, Paul R. Wallace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dickens et al v. Danberg et al
as 1:2010cv00786
Plaintiff:
Kevin L. Dickens, Roman Shankaras and Thomas Gordon
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Thomas Carroll, Rick Kearney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Epperson v. Phelps et al
as 1:2010cv00738
Plaintiff:
Kevin S. Epperson
Defendant:
Perry Phelps, Chaplain Frank Pennell, Henry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Brathwaite v. Phelps et al
as 1:2010cv00646
Plaintiff:
Kevin C. Brathwaite
Defendant:
Perry Phelps, David Pierce, Christopher Klien and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riley v. Correctional Medical Services et al
as 1:2010cv00233
Plaintiff:
Kevin Riley
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Cynthia Williams and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roy v. Phelps et al
as 1:2009cv00654
Petitioner:
Kevin A. Roy
Respondent:
Perry Phelps and Attorney General of the State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Forehand v. Morgan et al
as 1:2008cv00780
Plaintiff:
Kevin L. Forehand
Defendant:
Phil Morgan and Carl Danberg
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
McNeill v. Morgan et al
as 1:2008cv00563
Plaintiff:
Dale Kevin McNeill
Defendant:
Phil Morgan, Ellis Kendle and Correctional Medical Services
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
