Cases 61 - 70 of 195
Ruffin v. Stephens et al
as 6:2016cv00162
Defendant:
FNU Adams, Bruce Armstrong, B. Barnett and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Ruffin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maldonado v. United States of America
as 7:2016cv00306
Plaintiff:
Robert Maldonado
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Ortuno-Maldonado v. United States Of America
as 7:2016cv00253
Plaintiff:
Ana Alicia Ortuno-Maldonado
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Maldonado v. United States of America
as 7:2016cv00180
Plaintiff:
Jose Maldonado
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Singleton v. Harvey et. al.
as 6:2015cv00339
Defendant:
Richard W. Harvey, Danny T. Lemons and Rene Maldonado
Plaintiff:
Colton Singleton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nava v. Stephens
as 4:2015cv03407
Petitioner:
Andres Maldonado Nava
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rebector v. Maldonado et al
as 6:2015cv00269
Defendant:
Melody Blalock, Richard W. Harvey, Roger C. Hill, Sr. and others
Plaintiff:
James Rebector
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rebector v. Maldonado et al
as 6:2015cv00268
Defendant:
Melody Blalock, Richard W. Harvey, Karen Lara and others
Plaintiff:
James Rebector
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maldonado v. Macias et al
as 3:2015cv00221
Respondent:
Don Franklin, Jeh C. Johnson, Loretta E. Lynch and others
Notice Only Party:
Magdalena Jara
Petitioner:
Efrain Chavez Maldonado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Morris v. Maldonado et al
as 6:2015cv00222
Defendant:
Yohaira De La Rosa, Assistant Warden Rene Maldonado, Jessica McNeil and others
Plaintiff:
Michael V. Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
