Cases 61 - 70 of 74
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01691
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brobston v. Schult et al
as 9:2010cv00242
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Brobston
Defendant:
Deborah Schult, Ms. Halladay, Mr. Helms and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Peterson v. Regina et al
as 1:2010cv01692
Plaintiff:
Alvin Peterson
Defendant:
Matthew Regina, Undercover Officer, New York City Police Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peterson v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv00814
Plaintiff:
Anthony Peterson
Defendant:
The City of New York, New York City Police Department, Farrelli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peterson v. Onondaga County Justice Center
as 9:2010cv00026
Plaintiff:
Carlos Peterson
Defendant:
Onondaga County Justice Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peterson v. Clinton Correctional Facility
as 9:2009cv01056
Plaintiff:
Carlos Peterson
Defendant:
Clinton Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. United States of America et al
as 9:2009cv00729
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Smith
Defendant:
United States of America, Dan Peterson, Susan Keiffer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Williams v. New York State Department of Mental Health et al
as 1:2009cv00303
Petitioner:
Chad S. Williams
Respondent:
The State of New York Department of Mental Health and Trica L. Peterson
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Crenshaw v. Green et al
as 6:2009cv06138
Plaintiff:
William Crenshaw
Defendant:
Michael Green, David Peterson, Walt Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Williams v. New York State Department of Mental Health et al
as 9:2009cv00097
Petitioner:
Chad S. Williams
Respondent:
The State of New York Department of Mental Health and Trica L. Peterson
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
