Cases 61 - 70 of 1,386
MARTINEZ v. UNKNOWN
as 4:2023cv00185
Plaintiff:
NELSON MARTINEZ
Defendant:
MILLER, SGT ANDERSON, UNKNOWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WASHINGTON v. DYAS et al
as 5:2023cv00123
Plaintiff:
SEDRICK WASHINGTON
Defendant:
COLE DYAS, EARL B KNOBLES, JR, RICKY MAZINGO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Bailey et al
as 3:2023cv00511
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Antwan Walker
Defendant:
Sean Bailey, Carey L. Randall, James R. Crow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCOTT v. SETTELMIRE et al
as 3:2023cv08882
Plaintiff:
TYLER R SCOTT
Defendant:
CORY SETTELMIRE, HEVEN TROPOLI and CEURRA ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wood v. Boncher
as 0:2023cv60755
Plaintiff:
Dale Scott Wood
Defendant:
Amy Boncher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
EDENFIELD v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 4:2023cv00129
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM F EDENFIELD
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA, OFFICE OF CRIMINAL CONFLICT AND CIVIL REGIONAL COUNSEL, SCOTT D MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stoddard v. Heilig, et al
as 3:2023cv00371
Plaintiff:
Russell A. Stoddard
Defendant:
Scott A. Heilig, Smith and McGee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STODDARD v. HEILIG et al
as 5:2023cv00084
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL A STODDARD
Defendant:
CORRECTIONS OFFICER SCOTT A HEILIG, LT SMITH, MAJOR MCGEE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Polk County)
as 8:2023cv00570
Petitioner:
Darrell D. Scott
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Knox et al
as 3:2023cv00298
Plaintiff:
Dionte Jermaine Davis
Defendant:
Tiffani S. Knox, C. Russell, Tyler Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
