Cases 61 - 70 of 83
DECAMBRE v. AVILES et al
as 2:2012cv00095
Plaintiff:
MARK DECAMBRE
Defendant:
OSCAR AVILES, EADY, L. LEVINE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SANCHEZ v. POAG et al
as 2:2011cv03824
Plaintiff:
JHON SANCHEZ
Defendant:
JONATHON POAG, MERRIL MAIN, SHANTAY ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRANDT v. ROSSI et al
as 3:2011cv02627
Plaintiff:
JOHN BRANDT
Defendant:
LAWRENCE ROSSI, WAVERLY ANDREWS, PIERRE NIGIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RAMOS v. ZICKEFOOSE et al
as 1:2010cv02680
Petitioner:
HUGO LIONEL SANCHEZ RAMOS
Respondent:
DONNA ZICKEFOOSE and HARLEY LAPPIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
DAWSON v. FRIAS et al
as 1:2009cv06050
Plaintiff:
KEITH DIJUAN DAWSON
Defendant:
JOSE FRIAS, GLEN LAWHORN, ROBERTO ORTIZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. GRONDOLSKY et al
as 1:2009cv05974
Plaintiff:
JERRY JACKSON
Defendant:
J. GRONDOLSKY, NORMA WOODALL, G. LAWHORNE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
OLIVER et al v. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, SPECIAL TREATMENT UNIT et al
as 2:2009cv05336
Plaintiff:
LORENZO OLIVER, EDWARD SALERNO, DOUGLAS MINATEE and others
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, SPECIAL TREATMENT UNIT, DR. MERRIL MAIN, CLERKE BRUNO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SANCHEZ v. GRONDOLSKY
as 1:2009cv05272
Petitioner:
DEDMAS SANCHEZ
Respondent:
JEFF GRONDOLSKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SANCHEZ v. VICTORIA SECRET STORES L.L.C. et al
as 2:2009cv04141
Plaintiff:
JUAN SANCHEZ
Defendant:
VICTORIA SECRET STORES L.L.C., MANAGER-SUSIE, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCHUMP v. GRONDOLSKY et al
as 1:2009cv00164
Plaintiff:
RODNEY SCHUMP
Defendant:
JEFF GRONDOLSKY, PRADIP PATEL, JOHN CHUNG and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
