Cases 61 - 70 of 306
KIDD v. DOUGHERTY COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2022cv00111
Plaintiff:
VIRGLE CLYDE KIDD
Defendant:
DOUGHERTY COUNTY JAIL, KEVIN SPROUL, KEN OSTRANDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MONSON v. DOUGHERTY COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2022cv00110
Plaintiff:
JERMAINE MONSON
Defendant:
DOUGHERTY COUNTY JAIL, DOUGHERTY COUNTY JUDICIAL SYSTEM, SHERIFF KEVIN SPROUL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CROSBY v. DOUGHERTY COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2022cv00107
Plaintiff:
JAMES L CROSBY
Defendant:
DOUGHERTY COUNTY JAIL, DOUGHERTY COUNTY JUDICIAL SYSTEM, SHERIFF KEVIN SPROUL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mosley v. Sproul
as 3:2022cv01399
Petitioner:
Franklin Mosley
Respondent:
Dan Sproul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Watford v. Sproul
as 3:2022cv01402
Petitioner:
Kenneth Watford
Respondent:
D. Sproul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CARTER v. SPROUL et al
as 1:2022cv00097
Plaintiff:
DESMOND CARTER
Defendant:
SHERIFF KEVIN SPROUL, KEN OSTRANDER, WILLIE LOCKETTE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALBRITTEN v. SPROUL et al
as 1:2022cv00092
Plaintiff:
MARION KEVIN ALBRITTEN, JR
Defendant:
KEVIN SPROUL, KEN OSTRANDER, CHIEF JUSTICE WILLIE LOCKETTE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KIDD et al v. SPROUL et al
as 1:2022cv00091
Plaintiff:
VIRGLE C KIDD and JAMES CROSBY
Defendant:
KEVIN SPROUL, KEN OSTRANDER, WILLIE LOCKETTE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Sproul
as 3:2022cv01218
Petitioner:
David Brown
Respondent:
D. Sproul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sullivan v. Sproul
as 3:2022cv01154
Petitioner:
Matthew G. Sullivan
Respondent:
Daniel Sproul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
