Cases 61 - 70 of 95
Grandinetti v. Rich International Airlines et al
as 1:2013cv00169
Petitioner:
Francis Anthony Grandinetti, II
Respondent:
Rich International Airlines, United Airlines, Any U.S. Airliners and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grandinetti v. Kingdom of Hawaii et al
as 1:2013cv00039
Plaintiff:
Francis Anthony Grandinetti, II
Defendant:
Kingdom of Hawaii, Republic of Hawaii, United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00676
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Fuller v. United States of America
as 1:2012cv00444
Petitioner:
Anthony T. Fuller
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Grandinetti v. U.S. Attorney General, for the United States of America et al
as 1:2012cv00430
Petitioner:
Francis P. Grandinetti
Respondent:
U.S. Attorney General, for the United States of America, President of the United States, U.S. Dept. of Justice (Honolulu) and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 3373
Hawkins v. United States of America
as 1:2012cv00036
Plaintiff:
Terrence Hawkins
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Greenfield v. United States of America
as 1:2011cv00452
Petitioner:
Therese Greenfield
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Nakamoto v. Kay et al
as 1:2011cv00455
Plaintiff:
Kenneth K. Nakamoto
Defendant:
Alan C. Kay and Probation Officer, U.S.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Tierney v. United States of America
as 1:2011cv00082
Petitioner:
Michael C. Tierney
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tierney v. United States of America
as 1:2010cv00675
Plaintiff:
Michael C. Tierney
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
