Cases 61 - 70 of 2,927
Vining v. Ciolli, Jr. et al
as 3:2023cv50088
Plaintiff:
Jerome Vining
Defendant:
Andrew Ciolli, Jr. and United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Wright v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv01102
Petitioner:
Adam Taylor Wright
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
United States of America v. Chapman
as 1:2023cv01489
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Vernon Chapman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
United States of America v. Jones
as 1:2023cv01358
Plaintiff:
Broderick Jones and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
Tuggle v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv02040
Petitioner:
Travis Tuggle
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
United States of America v. Penn
as 1:2023cv01307
Plaintiff:
Dupree Penn
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
Keith v. United States of America et al
as 2:2023cv02037
Plaintiff:
TyJuan De-Andre Keith
Defendant:
United States of America, Barack Obama, Joe Biden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carroll v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv00963
Petitioner:
James J Carroll
Respondent:
UNITED STATES and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
United States of America v. Porraz
as 1:2023cv00908
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Ruben Porraz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
United States of America v. Chester
as 1:2023cv00565
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Gregory Chester
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
