Cases 61 - 70 of 83
PHILLIPS v. KASCO et al
as 1:2009cv00774
Plaintiff:
SHAWN A. PHILLIPS
Defendant:
MICHAEL KASCO, EIGHT UNKNOWN and CATHY L. LANIER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RODRIQUEZ v. REESE et al
as 1:2009cv00801
Plaintiff:
JUAN RODRIQUEZ
Defendant:
CONSTANCE REESE, NAME UNKNOWN and HARELY G. LAPPIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SMITH v. FENTY et al
as 1:2009cv00748
Plaintiff:
PHILLIPPE L. SMITH
Defendant:
A. FENTY, D. BROWN, UNKNOWN ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR OF THE D.C. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HALL v. MUELLER et al
as 1:2009cv00711
Plaintiff:
MARK HALL
Defendant:
ROBERT MUELLER and UNKNOWN AGENTS OF THE U.S. GOVERNMENT
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00277
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
GOODMAN v. LEWIS et al
as 1:2009cv00059
Plaintiff:
ERNEST NELSON GOODMAN
Defendant:
UNKNOWN OFFICER and UNKNOWN OFFICER
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
LANCELLOTTI v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2008cv02179
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL STEPHEN LANCELLOTTI
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, AGENT TO UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, HARLEY LAPPIN and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
PHILLIPS v. LANIER, et al
as 1:2008cv01877
Plaintiff:
SHAWN A. PHILLIPS
Defendant:
CATHY L. LANIER and EIGHT UNKNOWN
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SALCEDO v. ROSSOTTI et al
as 1:2008cv00814
Plaintiff:
JOSE GUZMAN SALCEDO
Defendant:
CHARLES O. ROSSOTTI, STEVE GEARY, TIMOTHY CAMUS and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
BAILEY v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2008cv00754
Plaintiff:
COURTNEY ANTHONY BAILEY
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, THOMAS WINKFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
