Cases 61 - 70 of 78
DEJESUS v. D'ILIO et al
as 3:2013cv05778
Petitioner:
PEDRO DEJESUS
Respondent:
STEPHEN D'ILIO and JOHN J. HOFFMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MENTER v. WARREN et al
as 2:2013cv05758
Petitioner:
WILLIAM MENTER
Respondent:
CHARLES WARREN and JOHN HOFFMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CASILLA v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2013cv05681
Petitioner:
BIENVENIDO CASILLA
Respondent:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, GARY M. LANIGAN and JOHN J. HOFFMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JORDAN v. HASTINGS et al
as 3:2013cv05359
Petitioner:
MARC A. JORDAN
Respondent:
BEVERLY HASTINGS and JOHN HOFFMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JORDAN v. HASTINGS et al
as 3:2013cv05358
Petitioner:
MARC A. JORDAN
Respondent:
BEVERLY HASTINGS and JOHN HOFFMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JORDAN v. HASTINGS et al
as 3:2013cv05254
Petitioner:
MARC A. JORDAN
Respondent:
BEVERLY HASTINGS and JOHN HOFFMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ROWE v. NELSON et al
as 1:2013cv04971
Petitioner:
DERIC ROWE
Respondent:
KENNETH NELSON and JOHN HOFFMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ALVARENGA v. LAGANA et al
as 3:2013cv04604
Petitioner:
JOSE ALVARENGA
Respondent:
PAUL LAGANA and JOHN HOFFMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PLANKER v. CHRISTIE, et al
as 3:2013cv04464
Plaintiff:
KEVIN PLANKER
Defendant:
CHRIS CHRISTIE, GARY LANIGAN, CHARLES WARREN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NEALS v. WARREN et al
as 3:2013cv04398
Petitioner:
TIVON E. NEALS
Respondent:
CHARLES WARREN and JOHN J. HOFFMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
