Cases 61 - 70 of 82
Lance v. Larson et al
as 9:2012cv00082
Petitioner:
John F. Lance
Respondent:
John D. Larson, Fourth Judicial District of the State of Montana, Twenty-First Judicial District of the State of Montana and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Anderson v. Kirkegard et al
as 6:2012cv00006
Petitioner:
Rowdy D. Anderson
Respondent:
Leroy Kirkegard, State of Montana, Montana Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Anderson v. Kirkegard et al
as 4:2012cv00005
Petitioner:
Rowdy D. Anderson
Respondent:
Leroy Kirkegard, State of Montana, Montana Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dethman v. State of Montana et al
as 6:2012cv00003
Petitioner:
Stanley D. Dethman
Respondent:
State of Montana , Montana Department of Corrections and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Riggs v. Kirkegard et al
as 2:2011cv00080
Petitioner:
Robert D Riggs
Respondent:
Leroy Kirkegard and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Roberty v. State of Montana et al
as 2:2011cv00056
Petitioner:
Anthony D. Roberty
Respondent:
State of Montana and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Perez v. Green et al
as 1:2011cv00101
Plaintiff:
Adrian Francis Perez
Defendant:
T. Green, Mike Ferriter, Patrick Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Elkins v. City of Glendive et al
as 1:2011cv00100
Plaintiff:
Jesse James Elkins
Defendant:
City of Glendive, Dawson County, Glendive Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Worthan v. Law et al
as 9:2011cv00048
Petitioner:
Kelly D. Worthan
Respondent:
Sam Law and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Baez v. Varnes et al
as 1:2011cv00011
Plaintiff:
Domingo Baez
Defendant:
Kelly J. Varnes and Mark D. Meyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
