Cases 61 - 70 of 141
McLin v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2016cv24094
Plaintiff:
Tracy McLin
Defendant:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections and Attorney General of the State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Venkataram v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2016cv23044
Plaintiff:
Natarajan Venkataram
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Prisons , J Hollingsworth, Dynan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Garrett v. United States of America
as 6:2016cv01108
Petitioner:
Tracy Garrett
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Turner v. United States of America
as 0:2016cv61155
Plaintiff:
Tracy Topaz Turner
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Bryant v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2016cv00874
Petitioner:
Vincent Tracy Bryant
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pinkney v. United States Justice Department et al
as 5:2016cv00103
Plaintiff:
Tracy Pinkney
Defendant:
United States Justice Department, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Charles Samuels and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PETERS v. SHOUPPE, et al
as 5:2015cv00251
Plaintiff:
TRACY ALLEN PETERS
Defendant:
GREG SHOUPPE, GINA JONES and CONNIE COPELAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WATSON v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 3:2015cv00366
Plaintiff:
TRACY WATSON
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watson v. Department of Corrections
as 3:2015cv00982
Plaintiff:
Tracy Watson
Defendant:
Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prater v. Jones et al
as 3:2015cv00810
Plaintiff:
Randall T. Prater
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections, J. Shunbert, Stuart K. Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
