Cases 61 - 70 of 6,910
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02741
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
DELISIO v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2023cv03351
Plaintiff:
RONALD MICHAEL DELISIO
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, STATE OF OHIO, OFFICE OF THE BISHOP - DIOCESE OF CLEVELAND and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
VISCONTI v. SEPE et al
as 1:2023cv03202
Plaintiff:
MAHA VISCONTI
Defendant:
LOUIS SEPE, LACBA IDP, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AKERMAN v. DOIRON
as 1:2023cv02575
Plaintiff:
MARTIN AKERMAN
Defendant:
SHERRI DOIRON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GELIN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv02855
Plaintiff:
EDSON GELIN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
REYNOSO v. USA
as 1:2023cv03222
Petitioner:
MANUEL D. REYNOSO
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
WILLIAMS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv03199
Plaintiff:
IRY JAMES WILLIAMS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MONTANTE et al v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2023cv02665
Plaintiff:
RANDY MONTANTE and RICARDO LEIJA
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
AKERMAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv02597
Petitioner:
MARTIN AKERMAN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
OWLFEATHER-GORBEY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2023cv02739
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. OWLFEATHER-GORBEY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, HARR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
