Cases 71 - 80 of 119
Lawton v. Secretary of the Florida Department of Corrections
as 3:2014cv00069
Plaintiff:
Burke Barrington Lawton
Defendant:
Secretary of the Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2014cv00032
Petitioner:
Thomas Steve Harris
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections, Attorney General, State of Florida, Jim Coats and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dutton v. Davis et al
as 3:2013cv01510
Plaintiff:
Frederick Charles Dutton, Jr.
Defendant:
M. Davis, J. Spaulding, R. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Silas v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2013cv01275
Petitioner:
Burke Lyntonia Silas
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BRYANT v. BURKS et al
as 5:2013cv00310
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JEROME BRYANT
Defendant:
ROB BURKS, DAVID L CALBERG and MICHAEL MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burkes v. Secretary Department of Corrections
as 1:2013cv20923
Plaintiff:
James Burkes
Defendant:
Secretary Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burke v. Coats et al
as 8:2013cv00658
Plaintiff:
Kenneth H. Burke
Defendant:
Jim Coats, 6 Unknown Officers, Unknown Food Service Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Rice et al
as 9:2012cv81021
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Demetrius Hill
Defendant:
Torrie Rice, Tammy Waldrop, A.S. Burke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
O'Neal Burks v. United States of America
as 3:2012cv00913
Petitioner:
Cristopher O'Neal Burks
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
BURKE v. TUCKER
as 3:2012cv00262
Petitioner:
GEORGE W BURKE
Respondent:
KENNETH S TUCKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
