Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Texas
Cases 71 - 80 of 2,112
Garcia v. Lumpkin et al
as 5:2024cv00370
Plaintiff: Antonio Andres Garcia
Defendant: Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin and Guadalupe County District Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01262
Petitioner: John Eldridge Murphy
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sanchez, Jr. v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 7:2024cv00094
Petitioner: Samuel Sanchez, Jr.
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Elizondo v. Lumpkin
as 7:2024cv00134
Petitioner: Jaime Elizondo
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Soliz v. Lumpkin
as 2:2024cv00073
Petitioner: Jesus Soliz
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ghose v. Lumpkin
as 3:2024cv00092
Petitioner: Sayantan Ghose
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clarke v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01205
Petitioner: James David Clarke, Jr
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alfaro v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv00741
Petitioner: Jose Alfaro
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Singleton v. Lumpkin
as 3:2024cv00087
Petitioner: Durrell Singleton
Defendant: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Valier v. Lumpkin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2024cv01165
Petitioner: Nkrumah Lumumba Valier
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?