Cases 71 - 80 of 83
KIMBUGWE v. CAMPBELL et al
as 2:2012cv07941
Plaintiff:
ERICK K. KIMBUGWE
Defendant:
DONNA CAMPBELL, JOHN TSOUKARIS, LCDR CHHIBBER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KIMBUGWE, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 3:2012cv07940
Plaintiff:
ERICK K. KIMBUGWE
Defendant:
DONNA CAMPBELL , O. VINCENT , STEPHANIE A. ZDANOWSKI, P.N. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CAMPBELL v. ELWOOD et al
as 3:2012cv04726
Petitioner:
TYRONE LLOYD CAMPBELL
Respondent:
BRIAN ELWOOD , CHRISTOPHER SHANAHAN , JOHN T. MORTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CAMPBELL v. UNION COUNTY CHIEF OF MEDICAL STAFF DR. JOHN DOE/DR. JANE DOR, UNION COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY INDIVIDUALLY AND OFFICIALLY
as 2:2012cv02750
Plaintiff:
HYDEACARR CAMPBELL
Defendant:
BRIAN L. SHRAGER, M.D., ST. FRANCIA MEDICAL CENTER, ST. FRANCIS MEDICAL CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CAMPBELL v. TAYLOR
as 1:2011cv05418
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA CAMPBELL
Defendant:
ERIC TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CAMPBELL v. AVILES et al
as 2:2011cv02986
Plaintiff:
SAM H. CAMPBELL
Defendant:
OSCAR AVILES and COUNTY OF HUDSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CAMPBELL v. HOLDER
as 2:2011cv02270
Petitioner:
MILTON CAMPBELL
Respondent:
ERIC HOLDER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CAMPBELL v. GIBB et al
as 1:2010cv06584
Plaintiff:
BERNARD CAMPBELL
Defendant:
GIBB, NICOLETTA, LOPEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SANDERS v. JACKSON TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 3:2010cv06305
Plaintiff:
MICHOLE SANDERS
Defendant:
JACKSON TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT, MATTHEW D. KUNZ, JOHN SIEDLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CAMPBELL v. ZICKEFOOSE
as 1:2009cv05269
Petitioner:
BERNARD CAMPBELL
Respondent:
D. ZICKEFOOSE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
