Cases 71 - 80 of 221
CYMES v. USDC CLERK, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2017cv00953
Petitioner:
NICHOLAS J. CYMES
Respondent:
USDC CLERK, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ROSEBAR et al v. BROOKS et al
as 1:2017cv00978
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ROSEBAR and ERIN ROSEBAR
Defendant:
DAVID BROOKS, WENDELL ROBINSON, WILLIAM C. JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FLETCHER v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BOARD OF PAROLE
as 1:2017cv00705
Petitioner:
DEMETRIUS FLETCHER
Respondent:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BOARD OF PAROLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LEE v. D.C. PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2017cv00669
Plaintiff:
DARRON K. LEE
Defendant:
D.C. PAROLE COMMISSION and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SMITH v. B.O.P. et al
as 1:2017cv00524
Plaintiff:
BILLY RAY SMITH
Defendant:
B.O.P., U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, U.S. PROBATION OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEWSOM v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2017cv00411
Petitioner:
JESSE WADE NEWSOM
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ADCOCK v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2017cv00376
Petitioner:
ROGER ADCOCK
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
PETERSON v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2017cv00378
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY PETERSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
RANSOM v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2017cv00375
Petitioner:
JOSEPH RANSOM
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
JENKINS v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2017cv00218
Plaintiff:
RICARDO C. JENKINS
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
