Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in District of Columbia
Cases 71 - 80 of 117
BANKS v. HARPER et al
as 1:2015cv01780
Petitioner: FREDERICK BANKS
Respondent: ORLANDO HARPER, ROBERT CESSOR, DAVID HICTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SLUSS v. MONICA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv01475
Plaintiff: MATTHEW DAVID SLUSS
Defendant: DONALD MONICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
TURNER v. HOLDER
as 1:2014cv02009
Plaintiff: DONALD TURNER
Defendant: ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
TURNER v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2014cv01851
Plaintiff: DONALD TURNER
Defendant: ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., MARK KIRBY and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DEBOSE v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA
as 1:2014cv01446
Plaintiff: DONALD R. DEBOSE, JR.
Defendant: STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. WINN, JR. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00613
Petitioner: DONALD LEWIS DAVIS
Respondent: LOUIS W. WINN, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
TINKER-BEY v. PORTER
as 1:2013cv01680
Plaintiff: DONALD TINKER-BEY
Defendant: PRISCILLA PORTER and 5TH DISTRICT POLICE STATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKMAN v. UNITED STATES FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2013cv01650
Plaintiff: DONALD G. JACKMAN, JR.
Defendant: UNITED STATES FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN et al v. O'MALLEY et al
as 1:2013cv01353
Plaintiff: DONALD RAY BROWN
Defendant: MARTIN O'MALLEY, KATHLEEN S. GREEN and JASON CLEM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BONE v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2012cv01673
Petitioner: DONALD D. BONE
Respondent: ERIC HOLDER and JANET A. NAPOLITANO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?