Cases 71 - 80 of 82
Moreno v. Ludwick et al
as 4:2014cv00414
Plaintiff:
Patrick Moreno
Defendant:
Nick Ludwick, Mark Roberts, Todd Ensminger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bitzan v. Phillips et al
as 4:2014cv00358
Plaintiff:
Mark Bitzan
Defendant:
Cynthia Phillips, Nick Ludwick, Rebecca Bowker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bitzan v. State of Iowa et al
as 4:2014cv00194
Plaintiff:
Mark Bitzan
Defendant:
State of Iowa, Iowa Department of Corrections, John Baldwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mark Morgan v. Jerry Bartruff, et al
as 13-1828
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Mark D. Morgan
Defendant - Appellee:
Jerry Bartruff, Gail Huckins, Kelli Collins and others
Johnson v. Baldwin et al
as 4:2012cv00426
Plaintiff:
Andrew Johnson
Defendant:
John Baldwin, Jerry Bartruff, Jeanette Bucklew and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams-El et al v. State of Iowa et al
as 4:2012cv00299
Plaintiff:
Michael Terry Williams and James Lee Blair
Defendant:
State of Iowa , John Baldwin , Jerry Burt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mark Morgan v. Clarence Key, Jr., et al
as 12-1039
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Mark D. Morgan
Defendant:
Jerry Bartruff, Gail Huckins, Kelli Collins and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Clarence Key, Elizabeth Robinson, Karen Muelhaupt and others
Morgan v. Key
as 4:2011cv00262
Plaintiff:
Mark Douglas Morgan
Defendant:
Clarence Key, Jr., Elizabeth Robinson, Karen Kaplan Muelhaupt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunter v. Helgerson et al
as 4:2011cv00135
Plaintiff:
Dante Darnell Hunter
Defendant:
Karen Helgerson and Jerry Bartruff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Johnson v. John Baldwin, et al
as 10-3573
Plaintiff - Appellant:
William Patrick Johnson
Defendant - Appellee:
John Baldwin, IDOC Director, Sheryl Lockwood, Eastern Asst Dept. Director, Jerry Bartruff, Religious Coordinator and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
