Cases 71 - 80 of 91
Kiderlen v. O'Brien et al
as 5:2013cv00326
Plaintiff:
Steven Kiderlen
Defendant:
Terry O'Brien, Uknown Castro, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Camacho-Negron v. Davis et al
as 3:2013cv00655
Plaintiff:
Joel Camacho-Negron
Defendant:
D. G. Davis, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boddie v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2013cv00035
Plaintiff:
Willie Boddie
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections, S. Milliken, John Doe #3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McNeeley v. Wilson et al
as 2:2012cv00488
Plaintiff:
Stephen McNeeley
Defendant:
FNU Wilson, FNU Bertuzzi, FNU Fenech and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LaRonde v. Head of Security John Doe #1 et al
as 3:2012cv00879
Plaintiff:
Caleem LaRonde
Defendant:
Head of Security John Doe #1, Officer Mrs. Thornton, Sgt. Meyers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hope v. Doe 1 et al
as 0:2012cv61056
Plaintiff:
Linc Hope
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARTIKEAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 5:2011cv00343
Plaintiff:
GLENN L MARTIKEAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, M CRUZ, NFN BERKEBILE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHISBY v. DOE 1, et al
as 5:2010cv00174
Plaintiff:
KELLY WHISBY
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2, JOHN DOE 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHISBY v. DOE
as 5:2010cv00176
Plaintiff:
KELLY WHISBY
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, JOHN 2 DOE, JOHN DOE 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tomblin v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2010cv00309
Plaintiff:
Charles Franklin Tomblin
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections, Warden Hicks, Corrections Officer Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
