Cases 71 - 80 of 107
Elliott v. Taylor
as 2:2015cv02131
Petitioner:
Kevin Michael Elliott
Respondent:
Jeri Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Huey v. Hall
as 6:2014cv01925
Respondent:
Guy Hall
Petitioner:
Kevin Duane Huey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anderson v. Nooth
as 2:2014cv01916
Petitioner:
Kevin Bradley Anderson
Respondent:
Mark Nooth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pohlman v. Hormann et al
as 3:2014cv01483
Defendant:
J. Baysinger, C. Coleman, C. DiGulio and others
Plaintiff:
Marlin Brandt Pohlman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bumgarner v Nooth
as 2:2014cv01269
Petitioner:
Kevin Mitchell Bumgarner
Respondent:
Mark Nooth
503) 947-4794 (fax:
Lynn David Larsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
bumgarner
as 6:2014cv01269
Respondent:
superintendent Mark Nooth
Petitioner:
kevin mitchell bumgarner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Boyd v. Horman
as 3:2014cv01229
Petitioner:
Leonard Jacob Boyd
Respondent:
Kevin Horman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv02075
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Davis v. Clackamas Co. Jail Admin. et al
as 3:2013cv02074
Defendant:
Clackamas Co. Jail Admin. and Corizon Clinic
Plaintiff:
Kevin Tamar Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Clackamas Co. Sheriff's/CCITF et al
as 3:2013cv02073
Defendant:
Clackamas Co. District Attorney Office and Clackamas Co. Sheriff's/CCITF
Plaintiff:
Kevin Tamar Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
