Cases 71 - 80 of 108
Brown v. Cameron et al
as 3:2013cv00278
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Brown
Defendant:
Tony Cameron, John Mills, Glen Jernigan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mills v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2013cv00148
Petitioner:
Carl S. Mills
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Covarrubia v. Monroe County Florida et al
as 4:2013cv10006
Plaintiff:
Noel Covarrubia
Defendant:
Monroe County Florida, 11 Officers from Monroe County Detention Facilities, Monroe County Sheriff Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Booker v. Department of Correction
as 3:2012cv01241
Plaintiff:
Joe Mills Booker
Defendant:
Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCRAY v. LEON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
as 4:2012cv00549
Petitioner:
MYRON MCCRAY
Respondent:
LEON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, STINSON, TERRY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MILLS v. SECRETARY FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 4:2012cv00255
Petitioner:
HENRY E MILLS
Respondent:
SECRETARY FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HAMPTON v. BLACKWOOD
as 4:2012cv00045
Plaintiff:
RUFUS HAMPTON
Defendant:
JAMES BLACKWOOD, KEITH MURPHY, L MCDONALD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HINES v. CAMERON
as 3:2011cv01117
Plaintiff:
CHARLES EDWARD HINES, IV
Defendant:
Tony Cameron, James Mills, JERNIGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HINES v. CAMERON
as 4:2011cv00497
Plaintiff:
CHARLES EDWARD HINES, IV
Defendant:
TONY CAMERON, JAMES MILLS, JERNIGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RAMSON-COOPER v. MILLS
as 3:2011cv00447
Plaintiff:
G L RAMSON-COOPER, I
Defendant:
STANLEY MILLS, JR and GLEN GREENFELDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
