Cases 71 - 80 of 1,283
Tammons v. Strubberg et al
as 3:2022cv01414
Plaintiff:
Norman Lee Tammons
Defendant:
Lieutenant Strubberg, Lieutenant Bujnak, Sergeant Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garner v. Flannery et al
as 2:2022cv02127
Plaintiff:
Brent A Garner
Defendant:
Scott Flannery, Tomika Rehmann, Corey Maloney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Maloney et al
as 2:2022cv02126
Plaintiff:
Carl Robinson
Defendant:
Corey Maloney, Scott Flannery, . Meeks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McMahon v. Johnson et al
as 1:2022cv01198
Plaintiff:
Scott McMahon
Defendant:
Brad Johnson, "Jane" Ellinger, "Jane" King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Flannery
as 2:2022cv02125
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Adams
Defendant:
Scott Flannery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hewitt v. Legge et al
as 1:2022cv01188
Plaintiff:
Charles Hewitt
Defendant:
K. Legge, Scott Gambo, Richard Kim and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Moon v. USA
as 3:2022cv01097
Petitioner:
Michael Scott Moon
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Estate of Jaimeson Cody et al v. Sangamon County et al
as 3:2022cv03065
Plaintiff:
Estate of Jaimeson Cody and Daniel Cody
Defendant:
Sangamon County, Andrew Van Meter, Jack Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stoutenborough v. Monti
as 1:2022cv01150
Petitioner:
Scott Stoutenborough
Respondent:
Daniel Monti
Not Classified By Court:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walker v. Hou et al
as 1:2022cv02224
Petitioner:
Frankie N. Walker
Respondent:
Grace B Hou, Greg Scott and Josh Shelton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
