Cases 71 - 80 of 117
Demos v. The United States et al
as 1:2014cv00521
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr.
Defendant:
The United States, United States of America, Washington, D.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tanuvasa vs. United States of America
as 1:2014cv00378
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Atlantica K. Tanuvasa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Sittman v. United States of America
as 1:2014cv00349
Petitioner:
Dennis Sittman
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Dominguez v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2014cv00202
Plaintiff:
Walter Dominguez
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Prisons, Federal Detention Center - Honolulu, David Shinn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00050
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Benitez v. United States of America
as 1:2013cv00668
Plaintiff:
Ildelfonso Benitez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grandinetti v. United States of America et al
as 1:2013cv00534
Petitioner:
Francis Grandinetti
Respondent:
United States of America, State of Texas, State of Oklahoma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tierney vs. USA
as 1:2013cv00171
Defendant:
Michael C. Tierney and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Grandinetti v. Rich International Airlines et al
as 1:2013cv00169
Petitioner:
Francis Anthony Grandinetti, II
Respondent:
Rich International Airlines, United Airlines, Any U.S. Airliners and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grandinetti v. Kingdom of Hawaii et al
as 1:2013cv00039
Plaintiff:
Francis Anthony Grandinetti, II
Defendant:
Kingdom of Hawaii, Republic of Hawaii, United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
