Cases 71 - 80 of 3,963
Carter v. United States Of America
as 5:2023cv00090
Petitioner:
Ashley Marshall Carter
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
CARITHERS v. USA
as 7:2023cv00108
Petitioner:
RAFON CARITHERS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Williams v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv04315
Plaintiff:
John T Williams
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Natt v. United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv04365
Plaintiff:
LaWayne Natt
Defendant:
United States of America, Bryan Burdick, Officer Pollard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
COBBLE v. USA
as 5:2023cv00370
Petitioner:
DANIEL ERIC COBBLE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Taylor v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv04368
Petitioner:
David Taylor
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
BOGAN v. USA
as 5:2023cv00364
Petitioner:
CLARENCE BOGAN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
BRINSON v. USA
as 7:2023cv00104
Petitioner:
RAHEEM TYRELL BRINSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Pipkins v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv04276
Petitioner:
Charles Floyd Pipkins
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Pate v. United States Of America
as 1:2023cv00134
Petitioner:
Detra W. Pate
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
