Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Montana
Cases 71 - 79 of 79
Treiber v. United States of America
as 1:2007cv00029
Plaintiff: Calvin Treiber
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Larson v. United States of America
as 1:2007cv00021
Petitioner: Robert C. Larson
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Chezem v. United States of America
as 9:2007cv00017
Petitioner: Larry Chezem
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
McChesney v. United States of America
as 1:2007cv00017
Petitioner: Benjamin McChesney
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Ritchie v. United States of America et al
as 9:2007cv00001
Plaintiff: Steven Ray Ritchie
Defendant: United States of America, Social Security Administration, Toralf and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Salazar v. United States of America
as 1:2007cv00002
Petitioner: Cesar Salazar
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Witherall v. United States of America
as 1:2007cv00001
Plaintiff: Allen Earl Witherall
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Old Person v. United States of America
as 4:2007cv00001
Petitioner: Randall Scott Old Person
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Dare v. United States of America
as 2:2007cv00007
Petitioner: Steven Douglas Dare
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?