Cases 71 - 80 of 966
Tlusty v. USA
as 3:2022cv00503
Petitioner:
Robert Tlusty
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Larry v. USA
as 3:2022cv00477
Petitioner:
Orlando Larry
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Francisco Martinez v United States of America
as 1:2022cv00955
Petitioner:
Francisco Martinez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Wyatt v. United States of America
as 2:2022cv00935
Petitioner:
Dameion D Wyatt
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Lawson v. USA
as 3:2022cv00435
Petitioner:
Kenneth J. Lawson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Wyatt v. USA
as 3:2022cv00429
Petitioner:
Thurman M. Wyatt
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Love v. United States of America
as 2:2022cv00860
Petitioner:
Ernest Matthew Love
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Giles, Dale v. United States of America et al
as 3:2022cv00405
Plaintiff:
Dale Giles
Defendant:
United States of America and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Thompson v. USA
as 3:2022cv00397
Petitioner:
Jonathan L. Thompson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Lippitt, Kenneth O. v. USA
as 3:2022cv00394
Petitioner:
Kenneth O. Lippitt
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
