Cases 71 - 80 of 2,928
United States of America v. Chester
as 1:2023cv00565
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Gregory Chester
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
Nordwall v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv01027
Petitioner:
Terrance Nordwall
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
United States of America v. Williams
as 1:2022cv07329
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Lamont Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
United States of America v. Issa
as 1:2022cv07310
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Sultan Issa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
Yarbrough v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv01442
Petitioner:
Aerial D Yarbrough
Respondent:
United States of America
Not Classified By Court:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gorbey v. Dukett et al
as 3:2022cv50422
Plaintiff:
Michael Gorbey
Defendant:
Lt. Dukett, Bergami, Capt. Avery and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Letterman v. USA
as 3:2022cv02817
Petitioner:
Brian L. Letterman
Respondent:
United States of America and USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Floyd v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv06506
Petitioner:
Robert Floyd
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
United States Of America v. Peters
as 3:2022cv50389
Plaintiff:
United States Of America
Defendant:
Adrian Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
Richardson v.Bergami
as 3:2022cv50373
Petitioner:
Jerome Richardson
Respondent:
United States of America, Thomas Bergami and D. Gonzalez, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
