Cases 71 - 80 of 163
Archunde v. Corizon Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00169
Plaintiff:
Orlando Archunde
Defendant:
Corizon Inc., Murray Young, William Poulson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carr v. Carlyn et al
as 1:2014cv00125
Plaintiff:
Jody Carr
Defendant:
Carlyn, Higgens, D W Yordy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Ellis et al
as 1:2014cv00018
Petitioner:
Michael C Williams
Respondent:
Jason Ellis and Idaho Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gray v. Kirkman et al
as 3:2014cv00013
Plaintiff:
William Katlynn Gray
Defendant:
Jeff Kirkman, Noel Barlow-Hust, Laura Ashford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newsome v. Reinke et al
as 1:2013cv00511
Plaintiff:
Thomas Ellis Newsome
Defendant:
Brent Reinke, Jay Nielson, Robin Sandy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ritter v. Reinke et al
as 1:2013cv00509
Plaintiff:
James Daron Ritter
Defendant:
Brent Reinke, Randy Blades, Eugene Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lightner v. Corrections Corporations of America et al
as 1:2013cv00494
Plaintiff:
William Lightner
Defendant:
Corrections Corporations of America , Jason Ellis , Melodee Armfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tortolano v. Poulsen et al
as 1:2013cv00438
Plaintiff:
Brent N Tortolano
Defendant:
William Poulsen and John and Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gerdon v. State of Idaho et al
as 1:2013cv00344
Plaintiff:
James Alan Gerdon
Defendant:
State of Idaho, State Appellate Public Defender Office, Twin Falls Public Defender Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fodge v. Bossolono-Williams et al
as 1:2013cv00331
Plaintiff:
Aaron Bert Fodge
Defendant:
Tina Bossolono-Williams, Corizon Health Services and William Wingert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
