Cases 71 - 80 of 96
Sherratt v. USA
as 2:2010cv00255
Petitioner:
William Henry Sherratt
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00903
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Winder et al
as 2:2009cv00799
Plaintiff:
Gregory Emmanuel Williams
Defendant:
FNU Winder, J. Tame, FNU Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sherratt v Utah State Prison, et al
as 2:2009cv00367
Plaintiff:
William Sherratt
Defendant:
Utah State Prison, Utah State Prison Mailroom and Utah Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leber v. Anderson et al
as 2:2009cv00035
Plaintiff:
Kenneth A. Leber
Defendant:
Lyle R. Anderson, Craig C. Halls and William L. Schultz
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Martinez v. USA
as 2:2009cv00036
Petitioner:
William Martinez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Lundahl v. United States Attorney General et al
as 2:2008cv00839
Petitioner:
Holli Lundahl
Respondent:
United States Attorney General, Director of the Bureau of Prisons and William F. Downes
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Williams v. Davis County Deputy Sheriff et al
as 1:2008cv00049
Plaintiff:
Jonathan L. Williams
Defendant:
Davis County Deputy Sheriff, Davis County Jail and Davis County Jail Employed Staff
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Atkins v. Payne et al
as 2:2008cv00052
Petitioner:
Tex William Atkins
Respondent:
A. Lynn Payne, Cheryl Weeks and Mark L. Shurtleff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Aderhold v. USA
as 2:2007cv01005
Petitioner:
Brian William Aderhold
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
