Cases 81 - 90 of 157
Cunningham v. Falmier et al
as 3:2017cv00126
Plaintiff:
Timothy J. Cunningham, Sr.
Defendant:
C/O Falmier, C/O Jenkins, Lt. Carrie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cunningham v. Bridwell et al
as 3:2016cv01360
Defendant:
C/O Bridwell, C/O Dunlap, C/O Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy J. Cunningham, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chancellor v. Brown et al
as 1:2016cv10489
Plaintiff:
Wesley D. Chancellor
Defendant:
William Brown, Randy Pfister, Major Tori and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Caruth v. Illinois Department Of Corrections et al
as 1:2016cv10338
Defendant:
Illinois Department Of Corrections, S.A. Godinez, Donald Stolworthy and others
Plaintiff:
James Caruth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Valentin v. Phister et al
as 1:2016cv09892
Plaintiff:
Edwin Valentin
Defendant:
Randy Phister, Lisa Qualls, Warr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holmes v. Illinois Department of Corrections Director, The et al
as 1:2016cv09475
Plaintiff:
Vincent Holmes
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections Director, The, Northern Reception and Classification Center, The, Randy Pfister and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Orozco v. Wexford Health Sources et al
as 3:2016cv00995
Plaintiff:
Victor Orozco
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Boswell Pharmacy Services, John Coe and others
Respondent:
R.D. Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. Krueger
as 1:2016cv01316
Petitioner:
Tiran Jenkins
Respondent:
Jeffrey Krueger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Orozco v. Wexford Health Sources et al
as 1:2016cv07564
Plaintiff:
Victor Orozco
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Boswell Pharmacy Services, John Coe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Truly v. Moore et al
as 3:2016cv00783
Defendant:
Assistant Warden Moore, Stephen Duncan, Joseph Yurkovich and others
Plaintiff:
Clark Truly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
