Cases 81 - 90 of 209
Godley v. Onondaga County et al
as 1:2016cv00825
Plaintiff:
Erick Godley
Defendant:
Onondaga County, Ann Rether, William Fitzpatrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Miller
as 1:2016cv07935
Petitioner:
Uquinn Banks
Respondent:
Chris Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rahman v. Schriro et al
as 7:2013cv06095
Plaintiff:
Esteban Herrera, Sean Smith, Malik Rahman and others
Defendant:
Commissioner Dora Schriro, Warden Luis Rivera, Deputy Warden Russo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A et al
as 1:2016cv05062
Defendant:
All State Insurance Company, J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A and Re-Con Trust, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Dawson Huber Coleman, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Fulton v. Baltazar et al
as 1:2016cv06085
Petitioner:
James Fulton
Respondent:
J. Baltazar, Administrators Staff, F.B.O.P. Administrative Remedy Coordinator and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Banks v. Trump et al
as 1:2016cv03253
Plaintiff:
Frederick H. Banks
Defendant:
Donald Trump, Mark Hornak, Sean Langford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Rikers Island Social Services Dept et al
as 1:2016cv01604
Plaintiff:
Sanders Lamont C.B. Adams
Defendant:
Rikers Island Social Services Dept, Victoria Dinsell, Bipin Subedi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Graswald et al v. Warden et al
as 1:2016cv00563
Plaintiff:
Angelika Graswald and Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Warden, Assistant D.A. Julie Mohl, District Attorney's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Banks v. Quinones et al
as 1:2015cv07042
Plaintiff:
Christopher Banks
Defendant:
Edwin Quinones, Frederick Bernstein, Valentine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv05706
Plaintiff:
Brandon Banks
Defendant:
City of New York, J. Ponte, Augustus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
