Cases 81 - 90 of 110
Betty Louise Ford v. D.K. Johnson
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 5:2012cv02227
Petitioner:
Betty Louise Ford
Respondent:
D K Johnson
Stephanie Nicole Erends v. D K Johnson
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2012cv02603
Petitioner:
Stephanie Nicole Erends
Respondent:
D. K. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Charlotte B Pleytez v. D K Johnson
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2012cv08892
Respondent:
D K Johnson
Petitioner:
Charlotte B Pleytez
Poe v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2012cv01691
Plaintiff:
Kristine Poe
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, N. Holguin, Madera Community Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rucker v. Johnson
as 3:2012cv02395
Petitioner:
Carole A. Rucker
Respondent:
D. K. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stephanie Nicole Erends v. D K Johnson
as 2:2012cv08312
Petitioner:
Stephanie Nicole Erends
Respondent:
D K Johnson
Perla Isabel Gonzalez v. D.K. Johnson
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 5:2012cv01535
Petitioner:
Perla Isabel Gonzalez
Respondent:
D K Johnson
Francisca Carmona v. D K Johnson
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2012cv07616
Petitioner:
Francisca Carmona
Respondent:
D K Johnson
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.