Cases 81 - 90 of 118
Johnson v. Easterling
as 1:2009cv00085
Petitioner:
William J. Johnson
Respondent:
Joe Easterling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bass v. Easterling
as 1:2009cv01260
Petitioner:
James DeWayne Bass
Respondent:
Joe Easterling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Croft v. State of Tennessee et al
as 1:2009cv01249
Plaintiff:
Frank Delano Croft
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Parole Board, Joe Easterling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Easterling
as 1:2009cv01245
Petitioner:
William J. Johnson
Respondent:
Joe Easterling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Baxter v. Easterling
as 1:2009cv01244
Petitioner:
Johnny Baxter
Respondent:
Joe Easterling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Easterling
as 3:2009cv01002
Petitioner:
R. L. Williams
Respondent:
Joe Easterling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hoyle v. Easterling
as 1:2009cv01223
Petitioner:
Jimmie Hoyle
Respondent:
Joseph Easterling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Roberts v. Easterling et al
as 1:2009cv01199
Petitioner:
Terry L. Roberts
Respondent:
Joe Easterling, Stephen D. Jackson and G. Robert Radford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pugliese v. Easterling
as 1:2009cv01190
Petitioner:
Daniel Pugliese
Defendant:
Joe Easterling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v. Easterling et al
as 3:2009cv00667
Petitioner:
Carvin L. Thomas
Respondent:
Joe Easterling and Attorney General for the State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
