Cases 81 - 90 of 297
LLOYD v. HENDRICKS, et al
as 2:2012cv02666
Petitioner:
JOSEPH LLOYD
Respondent:
ROY L. HENDRICKS, JOHN TSOUKARIS, JANET NAPOLITANO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MUNOZ v. LOSPINUSO et al
as 2:2012cv02664
Petitioner:
PEDRO JOSUE MIRA MUNOZ
Respondent:
MARK LOSPINUSO , WAYNE MULLER , WILLIAM JOYCE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BOACHIE v. AVILES et al
as 2:2012cv02663
Petitioner:
OPOKU BERNARD BOACHIE
Respondent:
OSCAR AVILES, WAYNE MULLER, RUBEN PEREZ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SESSAY v. HENDRICKS et al
as 2:2012cv02667
Petitioner:
LINDSWORTH SESSAY
Respondent:
ROY L. HENDRICKS, JOHN TSOUKARIS, JANET NAPOLITANO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CASTILLO v. AVILES et al
as 2:2012cv02388
Petitioner:
JULIAN RICARDO CASTILLO
Respondent:
OSCAR AVILES, CHRISTOPHER SHANAHAN, JOHN T. MORTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MOUSSA v. AVILES et al
as 2:2012cv02423
Petitioner:
DOUCOURE MOUSSA
Respondent:
OSCAR AVILES, WAYNE MULLER, RUBEN PEREZ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
FLORENTINO v. TAY-TAYLOR et al
as 3:2012cv02349
Petitioner:
WILLY RAFAEL FLORENTINO
Respondent:
YVETTE TAY-TAYLOR , WILLIAM JOYCE , CHRISTOPHER SHANAHAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MATER v. SHANAHAN et al
as 2:2012cv02387
Petitioner:
AHMED NAGI MATER
Respondent:
CHRISTOPHER SHANAHAN, WAYNE MULLER, JANET NAPOLITANO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
COUTARD v. WOOD et al
as 3:2012cv02256
Petitioner:
RICHARD PERPETUA COUTARD
Respondent:
E. WOOD, MONMOUTH COUNT CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, SCOTT A. WEBER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
KHEMRAJ v. MULLER et al
as 2:2012cv02249
Petitioner:
PARAMANAND KHEMRAJ
Respondent:
WAYNE MULLER , RUBEN PEREZ, CHRISTOPHER SHANAHAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
