Cases 81 - 90 of 123
Williams El Bey v. Gentry et al
as 2:2017cv01462
Defendant:
Avilas and Jo Gentry
Plaintiff:
Thomas L. Williams El Bey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Matlean v. Dzurenda et al
as 2:2017cv01461
Defendant:
Romeo Aranas, S L Clark, Dr John Doi and others
Plaintiff:
James KW Matlean
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Law Library et al
as 2:2017cv01280
Defendant:
Rodrigo Espino, Jo Gentry, Law Library and others
Plaintiff:
Lausteveion Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Gentry et al
as 2:2017cv01254
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Jo Gentry
Petitioner:
Kelvin Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams El Bey v. Gentry et al
as 3:2017cv00259
Respondent:
Jo Gentry and Nevada Attorney General
Petitioner:
Thomas L. Williams El Bey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Elizabeth Carley v. Jo Gentry, et al
as 17-15847
Petitioner - Appellant:
ELIZABETH CARLEY
Respondent - Appellee:
JO GENTRY, Warden, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA and NDOC/FMWCC
Johnson v. Willis et al
as 2:2017cv01121
Defendant:
Adams, Carson City, Nevada, Clark County, Nevada and others
Plaintiff:
Lausteveion Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cunningham v. Gentry et al
as 2:2017cv01094
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Jo Gentry
Petitioner:
Tony L Cunningham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bailey v. Gentry et al
as 2:2017cv00866
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Jo Gentry
Petitioner:
Larry Bailey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reed v. Gentry et al
as 2:2017cv00648
Respondent:
Jo Gentry and Nevada Attorney General
Petitioner:
Max Reed, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
