Cases 81 - 90 of 192
Lamar v. Zavaras, et al
as 11-1131
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANDREW MARK LAMAR
Respondent - Appellee:
ARISTEDES ZAVARAS, Executive Director of the Department of Corrections and JOHN W. SUTHERS, the Attorney General of the State of Coloado
Austin v. Milyard et al
as 1:2011cv00633
Petitioner:
Dimitric Austin
Respondent:
Kevin Milyard and John W. Suthers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tyler v. Arellano, et al
as 11-1101
Petitioner - Appellant:
CYCLE LEE TYLER
Respondent - Appellee:
MICHAEL ARELLANO and JOHN W. SUTHERS, Attorney General of the State of Colorado
Winkler v. Mullarky, et al
as 11-1098
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAWN MANDEL WINKLER
Defendant - Appellee:
MARY J. MULLARKY, GREGORY J. HOBB, JR., ALEX J. MARTINEZ, Justice and others
Lebere v. Abbott, et al
as 11-1090
Petitioner - Appellant:
KENT ERIC LEBERE
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES ABBOTT, Warden and JOHN W. SUTHERS, the Attorney General of the State of Colorado
Pavlov v. Suthers, et al
as 11-1040
Petitioner - Appellant:
STANIMIR GEORGIEV PAVLOV, AKA Atanas Velichkov Yordanvo
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN W. SUTHERS, Attorney General of the State of Colorado and SMELZER, [sic],
Hammonds v. Zavares et al
as 1:2011cv00184
Petitioner:
John F. Hammonds
Respondent:
Aristedes Zavares and John W. Suthers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Martin v. Jones, et al
as 11-1031
Petitioner - Appellant:
SHAY DION MARTIN
Respondent - Appellee:
SUSAN JONES and JOHN W. SUTHERS, The Attorney General of the State of Colorado
Farris v. Broaddus, et al
as 11-1001
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBIN FARRIS
Respondent - Appellee:
MARK A. BROADDUS, Warden and JOHN W. SUTHERS, Attorney General of the State of Colorado
Gillison v. Ritter, et al
as 10-1566
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD GILLISON
Defendant - Appellee:
BILL RITTER, Governor of Colorado, JOHN W. SUTHERS, Colorado Attorney General, NICOLE S. GELLAR, Deputy Attorney General and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
