Cases 81 - 90 of 1,247
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv01900
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burns v. Contract Doctors et al
as 3:2022cv00372
Plaintiff:
John C. Burns
Defendant:
Contract Doctors, Kelly Martinez, San Diego Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv01546
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
(HC) Clarke v. SCSO et al
as 2:2022cv00380
Petitioner:
Lee Kelly Clarke
Respondent:
SCSO, M. Johnson, Randell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bonilla v. Clay et al
as 4:2022cv01130
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
Clarence Don Clay, Jeffrey W Horner, Tara M Desautels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Whittenberg v. Ayala et al
as 1:2022cv00197
Plaintiff:
Lane Kelly Whittenberg
Defendant:
Jose Tovar Ayala and Philip Blackman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kenyon Darrell Brown v. State of California et al
as 5:2022cv00288
Plaintiff:
Kenyan Derrall Brown and Kenyon Darrell Brown
Defendant:
State of California and Kelly Santaro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00883
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00437
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bonilla v. Marin County et al
as 4:2022cv00272
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
Marin County, Lori Frugoli, Kelly V. Simmons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
