Cases 81 - 90 of 91
Lauderdale v. Fronerberger et al
as 1:2009cv01643
Plaintiff:
Curtis Lauderdale
Defendant:
Owen Fronerberger, Pamela Gaitor and Charles Hynes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chadderdon v. Mendez et al
as 6:2008cv06488
Plaintiff:
Daniel Owen Chadderdon
Defendant:
Edwin Mendez, Jane Doe, David D. Sojda and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Sallee v. United States of America et al
as 1:2008cv05848
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Franklin Sallee, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America, Richard Owen's and Southern District Court of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McChesney v. Hogan et al
as 9:2008cv00563
Plaintiff:
David McChesney
Defendant:
Michael Hogan, Donald Sawyer, Terri Maxymillian and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Stuart v. American Insulation et al
as 1:2008cv03923
Plaintiff:
Cal Stuart
Defendant:
American Insulation, Anchor Packing Company, Combustion Engineering and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bell v. Lasacali et al
as 1:2008cv00278
Plaintiff:
Elijah Bell
Defendant:
Lasacali, Catev, Freeman and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Daley v. U.S. Department Of Justice et al
as 1:2008cv00190
Petitioner:
Deon Earl Daley
Respondent:
U.S. Department Of Justice, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Board of Immigration Appeals and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Garner v. Owens et al
as 1:2008cv00222
Plaintiff:
Eric Garner
Defendant:
William Owens, The City of New York and The New York City Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garner v. Owens et al
as 1:2007cv11513
Plaintiff:
Eric Garner
Defendant:
William Owens, The City of New York and The New York Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Owens v. Graham
as 1:2007cv00797
Petitioner:
Rickey Owens
Respondent:
H. D. Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
