Cases 81 - 90 of 94
WOOD v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2008cv04515
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP WOOD
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY and MICHELLE RICCI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WOOD v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY
as 1:2008cv04225
Petitioner:
PHILLIP WOOD
Respondent:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
WOOD v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, et al
as 1:2008cv02116
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP WOOD
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, MICHELLE RICCI and JAMES DRUMM
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
WOOD v. NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON
as 1:2008cv02166
Petitioner:
PHILLIP WOOD
Respondent:
NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
PHILLIPS v. SKRADZINSKI et al
as 1:2007cv05360
Plaintiff:
VICTA W. PHILLIPS
Defendant:
RAYMOND SKRADZINSKI, JOHN DOE and SALEM COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PHILLIP v. MCKENZIE et al
as 2:2007cv04994
Petitioner:
RONALD PHILLIP
Respondent:
EDWARD MCKENZIE, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, SCOTT WEBER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
OLIVARES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2007cv03476
Plaintiff:
ANGEL OLIVARES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , PRADIP M. PATEL , S. SULAYMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WATSON v. ROGERS et al
as 2:2007cv02165
Plaintiff:
ROBERT P. WATSON
Defendant:
GRACE ROGERS, GEORGE HAYMAN, RONALD CATHEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HEMPHILL v. ROGERS et al
as 2:2007cv02162
Plaintiff:
JAMES HEMPHILL
Defendant:
GRACE ROGERS, GEORGE HAYMAN, RONALD CATHEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RAMOS v. ROGERS et al
as 2:2007cv02164
Plaintiff:
RAMONCITO RAMOS
Defendant:
GRACE ROGERS, GEORGE HAYMAN, RONALD CATHEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
