Cases 81 - 90 of 312
Hinton v. Prack et al
as 9:2012cv01844
Plaintiff:
Leonard Hinton
Defendant:
A. Prack, D. Venettozzi, S. Bullis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Canty v. Rock
as 6:2012cv06684
Petitioner:
Moshe Cinque Canty
Respondent:
David Rock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Henson et al v. Department of Correctional Services et al
as 9:2012cv01816
Plaintiff:
Bruce Henson and Edward Saldano
Defendant:
Department of Correctional Services, Upstate Correctional Facility, Superintendent D. Rock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Williams et al
as 9:2012cv01775
Plaintiff:
John White
Defendant:
Patricia L. Williams, Richard MacWilliams, C. Demers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Rock, et al
as 9:2012cv01745
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Jones
Defendant:
Amber Hawthorne, N. Smith, Nurse Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Epps v. Rock
as 9:2012cv01748
Plaintiff:
Edward Epps
Defendant:
David Rock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
West v. Rock
as 9:2012cv01611
Petitioner:
Patrick E. West
Respondent:
David A. Rock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Buthers et al
as 9:2012cv01613
Plaintiff:
Paul Smith
Defendant:
Lucy Buthers, Bryan Bradt, Cathy Koengsmann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Celestin v. Fischer et al
as 9:2012cv01612
Plaintiff:
Clivens Celestin
Defendant:
Brian Fischer, David Rock and Alec H. Friedmann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alston v. Rock et al
as 7:2012cv08092
Petitioner:
Rodney Alston
Respondent:
David Rock and Upstate Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
