Cases 81 - 90 of 111
Muse v. Arnold et al
as 3:2011cv01171
Plaintiff:
Royland D. Muse
Defendant:
Robert Arnold, Official Officers of Rutherford County Sheriff Department, Parker f/n/u and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Timms v. Tucker et al
as 3:2011cv01109
Plaintiff:
William Timms
Defendant:
f/n/u Tucker and Rutherford County Adult Detention Center Medical Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holliday v. Rutherford County, Tennessee
as 3:2011cv00843
Petitioner:
Josh Holliday
Respondent:
Rutherford County, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Martin v. Rutherford County Work Center, et al.
as 3:2011cv00813
Plaintiff:
Marques Martin
Defendant:
Rutherford County Work Center, The County of Rutherford County, Tennessee, f/n/u Salandy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garrett v. Rutherford County et al
as 3:2011cv00734
Plaintiff:
Bobby Walter Garrett
Defendant:
Rutherford County and Rutherford County Adult Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. R.C.A.D.C. et al
as 3:2011cv00513
Plaintiff:
Melvin B. Wilson
Defendant:
R.C.A.D.C. and Rutherford County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alajemba v. Rutherford County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2011cv00472
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Alajemba
Defendant:
Rutherford County, Tennessee and Rudd Medical Management
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Rutherford County Sheriffs Dept et al
as 3:2011cv00417
Plaintiff:
James Herman Anderson
Defendant:
Rutherford County Sheriffs Dept, Rutherford County, TN and Robert Arnold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brewer v. Rutherford County
as 3:2011cv00363
Plaintiff:
Danny Lee Brewer
Defendant:
Rutherford County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lyles v. Rutherford County Adult Detention Center et al
as 3:2011cv00266
Plaintiff:
Kenyata K. Lyles
Defendant:
Rutherford County Adult Detention Center , John Daniel Rudd , Cindy Wayley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
