Cases 81 - 90 of 335
ACCURSO v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2017cv02626
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY ACCURSO
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
FOREMAN v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2017cv02367
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN P. FOREMAN
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRAY v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2017cv01750
Plaintiff:
GLEN GARY GRAY, III
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STINE v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2017cv01127
Plaintiff:
MIKEAL GLENN STINE
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GOVEREH v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2017cv01053
Plaintiff:
ONESSIMUS M. GOVEREH
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TYLER v. U.S. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2017cv01107
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE T. TYLER
Defendant:
U.S. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, GEO GROUP, INC., D. RAY JAMES CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
CHANDLER v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2017cv00784
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY RAY CHANDLER, SR.
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and A. LEVI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CHANDLER v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2017cv00765
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY RAY CHANDLER, SR.
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and JACK FOX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
MOORE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2017cv00651
Plaintiff:
DARRELL ROBERT MOORE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SANDOVAL v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2017cv00567
Plaintiff:
HECTOR SANDOVAL
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE , EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE U.S. ATTORNEY'S , FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
