Cases 81 - 90 of 2,032
Whitaker v. USA
as 3:2023cv01337
Petitioner:
Sevario Whitaker
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Cox v. United States
as 4:2023cv01329
Petitioner:
Andrew Cox
Respondent:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bolinsky v. USA
as 3:2023cv01263
Petitioner:
Bruce Bolinsky
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Lewis v. USA
as 1:2023cv01245
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Lewis
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Williams v. USA
as 1:2023cv01258
Petitioner:
Arvis Williams, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Luster v. United States of America
as 5:2023cv01185
Petitioner:
Vernon Marquis-Mcghee Luster
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Phillips v. Johnson and Johnson et al
as 1:2023cv01152
Plaintiff:
Gerald K. Phillips and Jerry K. Phillips
Defendant:
Johnson and Johnson, Secretary Department of Health and Human Services, Cuyahoga County City Government and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Saunders v. USA
as 5:2023cv01129
Petitioner:
Joshua Saunders
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Barlow v. USA
as 5:2023cv01105
Petitioner:
Matthew G. Barlow
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Polk v. USA
as 1:2023cv01098
Petitioner:
Rico Polk
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
