Cases 81 - 90 of 192
SCHOTZ v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 1:2014cv01212
Plaintiff:
BARRY R. SCHOTZ
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCHOTZ v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 1:2014cv01106
Plaintiff:
BARRY R. SCHOTZ
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. SAMUELS et al
as 1:2014cv00911
Plaintiff:
ERIC LAMONT JOHNSON
Defendant:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR. and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DANSER v. SAMUELS et al
as 1:2014cv00867
Plaintiff:
DAVID K. DANSER
Defendant:
GEORGE E. SAMUELS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, RODNEY W. CHANDLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SLUSS v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 1:2014cv00759
Petitioner:
MATTHEW SLUSS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HINTZ v. GERSON et al
as 1:2014cv00640
Petitioner:
SCOTT HINTZ
Respondent:
SUSAN B. GERSON, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, LISA MOORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LADEAIROUS v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 1:2014cv00643
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH MICHAEL LADEAIROUS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AGURS v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE CRIMINAL DIVISION et al
as 1:2014cv00188
Plaintiff:
DAMON B. AGURS, SR.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE CRIMINAL DIVISION, KENNETH COURTER, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OFFICE OF INFORMATION POLICY and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
WOODS v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 1:2014cv00134
Plaintiff:
REGINALD WOODS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VADEN v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 1:2014cv00234
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL V. VADEN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
