Cases 81 - 90 of 123
ROSARIO-PORTER v. CHERTOFF et al
as 2:2008cv02926
Petitioner:
FERNANDA ROSARIO-PORTER
Respondent:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, JULIE L. MYERS, JOHN P. TORRES and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
YALLAH v. CHERTOFF et al
as 1:2008cv02289
Petitioner:
BENEDICT YALLAH
Respondent:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, MICHAEL MUKASEY, GARY MEAD and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
BIPLOB v. WEBER et al
as 2:2008cv01852
Petitioner:
AHMED BIPLOB
Respondent:
S. WEBER and MICHAEL CHERTOFF
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
BIPLOB v. WEBER et al
as 2:2008cv01809
Petitioner:
AHMED BIPLOB
Respondent:
S. WEBER and MICHAEL CHERTOFF
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
ZHU v. MUKASEY et al
as 2:2008cv01876
Petitioner:
JIN SHUN ZHU
Respondent:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, SCOTT WEBER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
THOMPSON v. CHERTOFF et al
as 2:2008cv01418
Petitioner:
SHAWN ANDRE THOMPSON
Respondent:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, SCOTT WEBER and OSCAR AVILEZ
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
WONG v. CHERTOFF et al
as 3:2008cv00492
Petitioner:
JIA GENG WONG
Respondent:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, MICHAEL MUKASEY, JULIE MYERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SUMBUNDU v. CHERTOFF et al
as 2:2008cv00313
Petitioner:
DAWUDA SUMBUNDU
Respondent:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, J EASTERLING and SCOTT WEBER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SINGH v. CICCHI et al
as 3:2007cv06162
Petitioner:
DHANNA SINGH
Respondent:
EDMOND C. CICCHI, SCOTT WEBER, JULIE L. MEYERS and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Det
EDDINE v. CHERTOFF et al
as 2:2007cv06117
Petitioner:
KEBBATI SALAH EDDINE
Respondent:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF and SCOTT WEBER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
